Sunday, 15 December 2013

The 'Not a Valentine' - Sottsass's Olivetti leather and steel bad girl.

Sottsass referred to his Valentine typewriter as a 'too obvious tart'. And looking at the design, it is easy to see why. Inserting the typewriter into its case is described as a 'woman sliding into her stockings', while the design of the machine itself clearly displays a set of exposed - to paraphrase Richard Polt, 'Areolae'. Which is exactly what they were meant to be.

They certainly weren't meant to be eggs.

A photo of my Valentine, which I used in my blog earlier this year. 

The design is intensely sexual with it's bold cues and hot red tone. It is unquestionably passionate in an era when much of the world was coming to grips with the rapidly changing state of sexual politics and attitudes. 

But I doubt someone would describe the design as 'sensual'. It was boxy, smooth and sleek - but the design is bold, flirtatious and attention seeking while lacking any real intimacy. These aren't shy machines, secluded wall-flowers that look for a quiet life. 

Sottsass's approach was consistently lacking in subtlety, and his designs called out at you with lurid intensity more than any other consumer product of the era that wasn't sold in stores that had blacked out windows. He just didn't do sensual.

However the Valentine wasn't the only design that exploded with such sexual boldness. While the Valentine has more unique design points (some may suggest novelty design points) than other typewriters, Sottsass had a hand in another design that harked back to the era of the pin-up queen Bettie Page, and the mail-order photographs of her that were filled with leather, rope and steel. 

I speak of - the Olivetti Lettera DL. Also known as the Lettera 33.



Boldly dressed in leather, the DL is skirted by faux metal caging that locks around the shape. It flirts with a little red Tab button, but the design of this typewriter is razor sharp, and unforgiving. This is a typewriter that is fast, bold and not the kind of machine you take home to your mother. 

The case itself continues the metal look. It is the same shape and the design as the Lettera 32 typewriter's case, but is toned to a dull steel that is bound in black leather that holds the whole look together. 

The design across the front holds a leather brow across the top of the keyboard as though it is Bettie Page's famous bangs framing the keys, which are locked into a trance with the writer. 

But it is a playful machine. It is a dress-up of the more respectable day-job dressed Olivetti Lettera 32. While the L32 is the machine that dons the sensible shoes and tries to fit in with its environment, the DL/33 is an animal that is looking for a night of action and adventure, that didn't want to just sit at home watching television. 

This is undoubtably the bad-girl that is the counterpoint to Sotsass's 'Too obvious tart'. 


From a writer's point of view, this machine is better balanced than the Valentine and is much more comfortable to write on for lengthy periods. The plastic pleather coated shell is quieter than the tinny L32, and resonates sound from the type bars quite differently. Acoustically, it compares favourably against the Valentine too. 

In my opinion this is a superior machine to the Valentine, and to be honest much better suited to me as a writer. I feel a lot more at home with this machine than I do with the Valentine, and I certainly like it a lot more than the L32 that it is based on. I guess with all that leather and faux-steel I feel the love for it as a motorcyclist. 

It took me a while to get hold of this machine. I eventually stumbled across one on the Gold Coast earlier this year. After a bit of a cleanup, it was right to go, and I have used it several times since. 

While it doesn't have the attention seeking novelty features of the Valentine, I find this design of Sottsass to be far more appealing. And I want to play. Oh do I want to play with this machine. 

Wednesday, 11 December 2013

What Holden and the Australian government could have learned from typewriters.

Going so soon? See ya Holden... 


The model car our umbrella was being designed for.


Got keys? 



So I should buy this Cruze instead of (insert X car) just because it is a Holden -
 the 'legendary Australian brand Holden'?
No thanks.. I prefer my Nissan Exxy.


This little guy won't go far, right? 



Bah-ha-ha.. Who would buy a civic! No self respecting man would, right! Right? 


Our prime minister favours a hands-off approach to the future.


The same government is decreasing the large-scale development of
broadband networks in Australia, which would have supported future
technological development in our economy.


Monday, 9 December 2013

Well Ton, Rob and Nick, guess what.....



In the past few days both Nick and Ton  have picked up Olivetti Valentine machines of their own. 

Here's Nick's blog on his purchase, which had followed Ton's which can be found here

*EDIT* Rob Messenger just pointed out that he also picked up a Valentine last week. They're multiplying! You can read about Robert's HERE

I was looking through Gumtree when I noticed a blurry photo of an Olivetti Valentine, at a price that was quite below $100. That's right BELOW $100. Maybe not the $15 typewriter that Nick got, but it was cheaper than most machines I had seen by more than half. However the photo wasn't all that great, and it was difficult to figure out what the condition of the machine was in, so I just forgot about it for a second. 

A split second. Then I sent the guy a message. 

Now, most of you may remember that I have had a very strained relationship with an Olivetti Valentine that is already in my collection. A machine that I eventually managed to return to operational condition, before it almost sent my fragile mental state into decline. 

So I drove over to Scarborough and had a look. I gave the typewriter a run on the seller's kitchen bench, and I was surprised by how nicely the machine ran. It had clearly been maintained - even though it was now full of dust, dirt and... a few scraps of paper. 

The storage case was in excellent condition, despite there being 'shed debris' smeared onto the crinkles of the plastic. But it wasn't scratched or cracked, and the rubber catches were still in perfect order. 

So, I threw down a handful of dollars and the typewriter was soon in my possession. 


I got it home and quickly scrubbed the fmuck out of the case and the back shell of the typewriter, and just put it on the kitchen table to get a few happy snaps of it. The red is such an endearing colour, and Ms Jane noticed it as I carried it past her. "Oh, that's a pretty red"! 

I'll probably do some better photos in the future for my blog and database, but these will do for now. 

I decided that when I bought it, that I could probably service it an re-sell it for a good deal more than I bought it for. But I'm not sure I want to sell this one now. A friend of mine was wanting my other Valentine some time back, and I may pass that one onto him. Or just sell it. It has a bit of a crack in its storage case which I can probably fuse back secure, although it probably doesn't need it. The condition that it is in, it would sell anyway as I have spent a fair bit of time nursing it back to full health. 

But two Valentines? 


I feel like I have started a Harem. Two Valentines. If I just started talking about 'my two valentines' with the nurses at work, they'd probably think that I have suddenly become a man of ill reputation. 

The guy that I bought the Valentine off had owned it since new. However he didn't have the manual for the machine, and for that I was a little sad. 

He bought it in 1971, and had shared it with his now ex wife for years. However, when they bought themselves a computer eventually, and as such the typewriter ended up being shoved into storage for quite some time. 

And now, I'm its second owner. 

As I was leaving, I asked him what prompted him to buy this typewriter originally. It turns out that he was working in the printing industry at the time, and wanted something specifically that had very stylish and different design. He was a very chatty chap, so I'd dare say that he worked in sales. 

So there we have it. I'm feeling the Valentine love tonight. 

And you know what? Despite the lack of a decent ribbon in this machine, It types actually quite nicely. I guess that's what you get when you find a machine that isn't a total basket-case from the go. I'd prefer it over my Lettera 32 to be honest. 

It reminds me of when I first started talking to the typosphere and Cameron over at Living in the woods, and he told me about his two machines. 'Two Valentines" I questioned. "Why"! But as it turned out, I have ended up in the same situation. 

Anyway, just because I know someone is bound to ask: 

Valentine (purchased by me in 2012) - 6863850  
Valentine (purchased by me in 2013) - 5526842

Anyway, may as well let my original Valentine finish off this blog post. 






Saturday, 7 December 2013

Just playing a small part with small parts.


Time to crack out the Remington 5 for a bit. And as it is such a nice day, the front deck will be perfect.



Thursday, 5 December 2013

An open letter to the Blogger/Google staff.




From my Olivetti Lettera DL. A Typewriter that has survived longer than all of Google's services, and saw their competitors become giants and fall.

Tuesday, 3 December 2013

A special thank you to a Typospherian.

I try to avoid blogging twice in 24 hours, but I was so touched by the generosity of a member of the typosphere, that I felt I immediately needed to say thank you. 






I have never seen a parcel packed so extensively! 







Has a typewriter? Must be a hipster...

Now... We've all seen this:


Typewriter in a park? Just add the word hipster, and you apparently have instant comedy. 

LOL! Right?! 

Right... 

Anyway, that 'meme' has been cycling about on the knuckle-dragger interwebs for a while now, and let's face it - it is pretty insulting to the guy photographed. I mean, like.... seriously... who takes a typewriter to a park anyway, right? It is 50 shades of weird to anyone that hasn't done anything interesting in their life, other than fly to Bangkok at huge expense in order to spend the entire trip getting drunk in a bar or pub just like one at home. 

For some reason I have an urge to put a label on anyone that labels someone as a hipster for using a typewriter - or something similar. 'Dipster' perhaps? 

Well it turns out that there's actually quite a compelling and interest story behind this typist. As I read it I felt sympathetic for him, not just as another typist, but as a person. He'd gone out and actually done something interesting. He went and did something different to the expectations of his family and friends, and actually created something. The fact that he created something that was positive and interesting, yet was belittled by keyboard commandos world wide that had dull and uninteresting lives lived in a perpetual cycle of doing the same dull lifeless routine that saw them lashing out at the rest of the world that wasn't trapped in the same hole, made me feel inspired.

Click here for the article.

It just reminds me about something Teeritz was talking about the other day - the utter dross of reality TV that people glue their social lives to here in Audtralia at the moment. It pretends to be art, but there's no art to it. There's no spontaneity. It is a performance, but it is a predictable performance.

Congratulations to this guy for getting himself out of his lounge room and doing something.

I think I can speak on behalf of the typosphere here,  when I say - we salute you.